Islamonweb

Abstract 

India's gold-trading regulatory frameworks demonstrate partial alignment with AAOIFI Sharīʿah Standard No. 57, with existing infrastructure supporting compliant investment structures, while critical gaps remain. The Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) Electronic Gold Receipt (EGR) system provides a regulatory foundation through mandatory physical backing, vault manager oversight, allocation requirements, and segregation protocols, which are essential elements for Sharīʿah compliance. Gold's use as collateral (Rahn) for loans and joint-ownership mechanisms also ensures full compliance. However, significant non-compliance exists in several areas: the T+1 settlement cycle for EGRs diverges from AAOIFI's mandatory T+0 requirement for constructive possession; digital gold platforms remain unregulated and lack guaranteed allocation; and interest-bearing instruments such as Sovereign Gold Bonds and the Gold Monetization Scheme violate Sharīʿah prohibitions on ribā. Additionally, derivatives and futures trading on commodity exchanges violates AAOIFI's ban on deferred counter-values. Recent regulatory proposals, including the RBI's 2025 Gold Metal Loan framework and proposed gold exchanges, present opportunities for alignment through settlement cycle modifications and structured alternatives to interest-based products. With targeted reforms implementing optional T+0 settlement for EGRs and Sharīʿah-compliant product alternatives, India can develop a strong Islamic gold trading ecosystem that serves Muslim investors while maintaining conventional market structures, positioning the nation as an emerging hub for Sharīʿah-compliant gold investment in South Asia.

Introduction

Gold occupies a distinctive and multifaceted position within Islamic finance, rooted in both scriptural foundations and historical economic practice. The Qur'ān and Sunnah consistently affirm gold's sacred status, with numerous verses designating it as a form of wealth requiring specific Sharīʿah rulings distinct from ordinary commodities. Beyond theological significance, gold functions as a critical medium of monetary value, capital preservation, and collateral in Islamic banking and investment frameworks. Unlike conventional finance where gold derivatives and speculative instruments dominate, Islamic financial principles restrict gold transactions to immediate, spot-basis exchanges with full counter-value settlement, ensuring alignment with fundamental Sharīʿah prohibitions against ribā (interest), gharar (uncertainty), and maysir (speculation).

The AAOIFI (Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions) Sharīʿah Standard No. 57 on gold establishes comprehensive jurisprudential guidelines governing permissible gold transactions. These standards mandate spot-basis trading with T+0 (same-day) settlement for gold-currency exchanges, constructive possession requirements, mandatory allocation and segregation for stored gold, and explicit prohibitions on deferred payment structures and derivatives. The Standard reflects centuries of Islamic legal reasoning, synthesized through the consensus of contemporary Sharīʿah scholars, and provides normative benchmarks for Islamic financial institutions, Sharīʿah-compliant investment portfolios, and Muslim investors worldwide.

India has experienced an unprecedented transformation in its gold market over the past decade, transitioning from a predominantly physical, informal sector toward regulated digital instruments and institutional trading frameworks. This transition reflects both global digitalization trends and India's position as the world's largest gold consumer, accounting for approximately 20% of global demand and a major gold trading hub in Asia.

Regulatory Frameworks for Gold Trading in India

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced the Electronic Gold Receipt (EGR) framework in 2021 to create a transparent and regulated market for gold trading within recognized stock exchanges. Under this system, physical gold is converted into electronic receipts that can be traded, held, and redeemed for physical gold. The EGR framework aims to standardize gold quality, ensure transparent pricing, and integrate gold as a financial asset, similar to securities. Each EGR represents gold stored in a SEBI-accredited vault, ensuring secure custody and traceability. This system also seeks to align India’s gold market with global best practices, facilitating both retail and institutional participation.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Government of India regulate gold imports, investment, and monetization primarily through the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and related circulars. The RBI oversees the import of gold by nominated banks and agencies, sets guidelines for gold loans, and supervises the operation of schemes such as the Gold Monetization Scheme (GMS) and Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs). These initiatives aim to reduce physical gold imports and encourage financialized forms of gold investment. Additionally, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) regulates the hallmarking of gold, while the Customs Department enforces import duties and anti-smuggling laws. Collectively, these regulations reflect India’s attempt to formalize and stabilize its vast gold economy.

In recent years, several fintech companies and e-commerce platforms in India have introduced digital gold investment services, allowing investors to buy, sell, and store gold in fractional quantities online. Platforms such as MMTC-PAMP, Augmont, and SafeGold offer gold-backed digital assets in which physical gold is held in secure vaults on behalf of investors. Although these products have gained popularity for their accessibility and low entry cost, they currently operate outside SEBI and RBI’s direct regulatory framework. This raises concerns regarding consumer protection, transparency, and Sharīʿah compliance, particularly regarding actual ownership, storage guarantees, and delivery mechanisms. The ongoing development of a comprehensive digital gold policy aims to bring these platforms under formal regulation, potentially aligning them with standards such as SEBI’s EGR system.

AAOIFI Sharīʿah Standards on Gold

In Islamic jurisprudence, gold holds a unique status as both a medium of exchange and a store of value, thereby subject to specific rulings concerning ribā and bay‘ al-ṣarf (currency exchange). According to Sharīʿah principles, any transaction involving gold must satisfy the conditions of immediate possession (qabḍ) and equal counter-value when exchanged with another ribawi item, whether gold, silver, or currency. Accordingly, deferred exchanges (bay‘ al-mu’ajjal) and unequal swaps of gold are prohibited, as they constitute ribā al-naṣī’ah or ribā al-faḍl. For a gold transaction to be Sharīʿah-compliant, ownership and possession either physical or constructive, must transfer to the buyer at the time of exchange. Constructive possession may include valid documentation or custody in a recognized vault, provided the buyer has full ownership rights and can demand delivery at any time. These rulings ensure that gold trading remains free from speculation, uncertainty (gharar), and interest-based practices.

The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI), through its Shari’ah Standard No. 57: “Gold and its Trading Controls” (2016), provides comprehensive guidance on gold-related transactions. The standard emphasizes that gold must be treated as a tangible asset, not as a mere financial instrument or derivative. It explicitly prohibits trading in “paper gold”, unallocated gold accounts, and futures contracts that lack real delivery or ownership. The AAOIFI standard permits gold to be incorporated into investment structures such as Mushārakah (partnership) and Muḍārabah (profit-sharing) funds, provided the underlying assets are structured to maintain Shari’ah integrity. The key principle here is that gold must be held in a fully allocated form, ensuring the investor has definitive ownership of the physical asset, even if it is stored by a custodian. Conversely, the standard restricts transactions that violate the immediacy and possession requirements, generally rendering unallocated gold accounts, gold futures contracts, and derivatives impermissible due to the presence of ribā or excessive gharar .

Comparative Analysis: Alignment and Gaps

The regulatory evolution of India’s gold market, particularly through SEBI’s Electronic Gold Receipt (EGR) framework, shows several areas of convergence with AAOIFI Sharīʿah standards. Both systems emphasize asset-backed transactions, physical delivery, and transparent ownership structures. Under SEBI’s EGR mechanism, each receipt is backed by a corresponding quantity of physical gold stored in accredited vaults, ensuring that the gold is identifiable, segregated, and deliverable on demand. This aligns with AAOIFI’s stipulation that investors must hold ownership of specific, allocated gold units, rather than claims on pooled or unallocated reserves.

Additionally, the EGR system discourages speculative practices and encourages spot settlement, promoting real-asset linkage rather than paper-based trading. The government’s push for hallmarking through the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) also resonates with Sharīʿah’s emphasis on certainty and quality assurance in trade (‘aqd al-bay‘). Moreover, India’s movement toward a more formalized and transparent gold ecosystem, with SEBI oversight and regulated exchanges, strengthens trust, documentation, and delivery mechanisms, which are consistent with Sharīʿah objectives of fairness (adl) and prevention of gharar.

Despite these alignments, several Sharīʿah concerns persist in India’s gold-trading landscape, particularly regarding digital gold platforms, deferred settlements, and interest-bearing financial structures. Many fintech platforms offering digital gold operate outside SEBI and RBI’s regulatory purview, leading to ambiguity in actual ownership and constructive possession. In several cases, investors purchase fractional gold units that remain under the platform’s custody without a clear right to immediate delivery, contravening AAOIFI’s requirement for qabḍ (possession) at the time of transaction.

Furthermore, India’s Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs), though innovative as a gold-linked investment tool, involve fixed interest payments and cash settlement, rendering them non-compliant with Sharīʿah principles. Similarly, the Gold Monetization Scheme (GMS) allows interest-bearing deposits of physical gold, which conflicts with the prohibition of ribā. Another concern arises from the potential for derivative trading or margin-based transactions in gold futures, which lack direct ownership of the underlying asset and entail high levels of speculation (maysir).

Opportunities in Sharīʿah-Compliant Gold Investment

The introduction of SEBI’s Electronic Gold Receipt (EGR) system represents a significant opportunity for Islamic investors seeking Sharīʿah-compliant access to India’s gold market. By ensuring that every EGR is fully backed by physical gold stored in accredited vaults, this framework offers an investment model consistent with AAOIFI’s requirements for tangible ownership and possession. The system’s emphasis on spot trading, transparency, and physical delivery reduces the risk of ribā and gharar, providing a viable alternative to speculative or interest-based gold instruments.

For Islamic investors, EGRs could facilitate Sharīʿah-compliant portfolio diversification, particularly for Islamic funds, waqf institutions, or zakat bodies seeking low-risk, asset-backed investments. Moreover, integrating EGRs into formal exchanges under SEBI’s supervision enhances market credibility, liquidity, and auditability, which are crucial for verifying Sharīʿah compliance. As India’s financial ecosystem gradually moves toward digitally integrated, asset-based systems, this development positions the EGR market as a promising platform for Islamic finance institutions to participate in the gold economy without compromising religious principles.

Potential Policy Reforms or Institutional Mechanisms

To fully realize the potential of Sharīʿah-compliant gold investment in India, several policy and institutional reforms are necessary. First, there is a need to establish a Sharīʿah advisory framework within SEBI or a collaborative body to ensure that regulatory policies and financial instruments align with AAOIFI Sharīʿah standards. This could involve the creation of an Islamic Finance Advisory Board, responsible for screening and certifying gold-related products for Sharīʿah compliance.

Second, the government and regulators could develop specific guidelines for digital gold platforms, mandating full physical backing, segregated ownership records, and real-time delivery rights. These measures would help transition unregulated digital gold schemes into Sharīʿah-compatible structures. Additionally, promoting Islamic gold-based financial products, such as Sharīʿah-compliant gold ETFs, murābaḥah-based gold trading, or ijarah (leasing) models, could attract both domestic and international Islamic investors.

Institutional mechanisms such as Sharīʿah-compliant auditing frameworks, ethical certification standards, and investor education programs could further strengthen confidence and market participation. Ultimately, harmonizing India’s regulatory environment with AAOIFI standards would not only expand access for Islamic investors but also enhance the integrity, inclusiveness, and ethical sustainability of India’s gold trading ecosystem.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The analysis demonstrates that India’s evolving gold trading frameworks, particularly through SEBI’s Electronic Gold Receipt (EGR) system, reflect a significant shift toward formalization, transparency, and asset-backed trading. These features align closely with the AAOIFI Sharīʿah standards, which emphasize tangible ownership, immediate possession (qabḍ), and avoidance of ribā and gharar. The EGR framework, with its vault-based custody and spot settlement mechanisms, establishes a sound foundation for Sharīʿah-compliant gold investment.

However, notable gaps and concerns persist. Unregulated digital gold platforms, interest-bearing instruments such as the Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs), and certain gold monetization schemes conflict with Sharīʿah principles by involving deferred delivery, speculative trading, or ribā. Additionally, the absence of a Sharīʿah governance structure within India’s financial regulatory environment limits the capacity to systematically certify compliance with Islamic finance standards. Thus, while India’s regulatory direction is compatible with Sharīʿah principles in spirit, it remains incomplete in its institutional and jurisprudential implementation.

To achieve full alignment with AAOIFI standards, India’s policymakers and financial regulators should adopt a Sharīʿah-integrated regulatory approach. This can be accomplished by establishing a Sharīʿah Advisory Board under SEBI or the RBI, mandated to review and certify gold-related products and trading systems. Such an institution could ensure that regulatory reforms are evaluated against AAOIFI Standard No. 57 (Gold and Its Trading Controls) and other relevant Sharīʿah benchmarks.

In conclusion, the convergence of India’s gold regulatory reforms with AAOIFI standards presents a transformative opportunity. With the right institutional support and policy adjustments, India can pioneer a Sharīʿah-compliant gold trading ecosystem that upholds both financial integrity and Islamic ethical values.

About the author:

Ahammed Nijad PC

Post Graduate Scholar, Dept. of Islamic Economics and Finance,

Darul Huda Islamic University, Kerala, India

References 

AAOIFI. (2016). Sharīʿah Standard No. 57: Gold and its Trading Controls. Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.

Ali, S. S. (2018). Islamic Finance: An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). (2022). Compulsory Hallmarking of Gold Jewellery and Gold Artefacts. Retrieved from [Insert Official BIS Hallmarking Circular/Regulation Link].

Hassan, M. K., & Shahid, I. (2019). Islamic Financial Products and Financial Inclusion in India: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(3), 421–440.

Ibrahim, A. M. (2020). Sharīʿah Governance in Islamic Financial Institutions. Routledge.

Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2011). An Introduction to Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2015). Master Circular on Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS) (Circular No. DBOD.No.Dir.BC.17/13.03.00/2015-16).

Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2023). Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme (SGB) Scheme 2023-24 (Press Release or Scheme Document). Retrieved from [Insert Official RBI SGB Link].

Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2024). Draft Directions on Gold Metal Loan (GML) – Proposed Regulatory Framework. Retrieved from [Insert Official RBI Draft GML Link].

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). (2021). Framework for Electronic Gold Receipts (EGRs) (Circular No. SEBI/HO/MRD/MRD-PoD-2/P/CIR/2021/658).

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). (2022). SEBI (Vault Managers) Regulations, 2021. Retrieved from [Insert Official SEBI Vault Manager Regulation Link].

World Gold Council. (2024). Gold Demand Trends 2023 (or most recent annual report). Retrieved from [Insert World Gold Council Report Link].

Yusuf, S. (2017). Legal and Regulatory Challenges to Islamic Banking and Finance in India. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 22, 268–278.

Zaman, M., & Nor, N. A. M. (2019). The Role of Islamic Financial Institutions in Promoting Economic Development. Review of Islamic Economics, 23(1), 1–25.

Zulkifli, A. H. (2019). Islamic Wealth Management: Theory and Practice. Wiley.