Islamonweb

Islamophobia is not solely rooted in political causes; it also evolves from epistemic injustices that result in political alienation and terrorization. Like anti-Semitism and xenophobia, Islamophobia has long and deep historical roots. It did not suddenly come into being after the events of 9/11, since there was an exponential growth against Islam in different parts of the world after this catastrophic incident. Even though Islamophobic cases and studies are common in the West, it is also visible in many parts of the world. While Muslims are considered as infiltrating migrants in the West, they are treated as backward who should be eliminated to unify the nation in the East. In India, this kind of targeted alienation has become stronger in recent years, driven by Hindutva political agendas. But at the same time, there are Southern regions of India that are resistant to Islamophobia and other kinds of polarisation to a great extent.

Behind this hatred and targeted attacks against Muslims and their institutions, there is a lack of understanding between people and epistemic injustices, both testimonial and hermeneutic. The first one, testimonial injustice, is due to the prejudices against Muslims, as if they are terrorists; the second one is due to the lack of conceptual or linguistic resources from the marginalized groups to articulate these experiences. Along with these, there are several epistemic vices which help to the growth of islamophobia. To resist this injustice and marginalisation, there are several organisations and policies in place. But because there are epistemic injustices, this must be addressed through epistemic resistance to eradicate them successfully. This article examines epistemic injustices in Islamophobia and how epistemic resistance can address them. To determine the injustices and resistant strategies, we need to understand the concept and short history of Islamophobia by considering it as cultural racism. The article will further focus on the case of South India and the role of epistemic resistance in controlling the strength of Islamophobia compared to the northern parts of India.

1. Understanding Islamophobia : History and Impacts

We can understand Islamophobia in simple words as a new form of racism in terms of culture, which considers the Islamic cultures as a threat to the common superior identity. In the modern context, awareness about Islamophobia became pervasive in 1997, with the publication of the Runnymede Trust report entitled “Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All”. But the term ‘Islamophobia’ was not coined by this publication; it was prevalent among the different sections of Muslim communities to describe the prejudice and discrimination they face in everyday life. The importance of this report is that it drew the attention of the media, intellectuals, religious leaders, and the public, prompting serious discussion of the issue. The basic problem of every atrocity against Muslims in the West is the cultural differences. But sometimes it may have other dimensions than culture, which is why some Islamic scholars considered it more complex than cultural racism.  If the old racism was based on a belief in biological superiority, the new racism -Islamophobia-  is based on notions of religious and cultural superiority. UN defines Islamophobia as “a fear, prejudice and hatred of Muslims that leads to provocation, hostility and intolerance by means of threatening, harassment, abuse, incitement and intimidation of Muslims and non-Muslims, both in the online and offline world”. It is promoted by institutional, ideological, political, and religious hatred and later develops into structural and cultural racism.

Even though the history of Islamophobia extends to the Crusades in the eleventh century, it took a considerable change with the “Global War on Terror” as a response to the incidents of 9/11. It helped to increase targeted atrocities like racial profiling, surveillance, spying, detention, and deportation of Muslim, Arab, and South Asian communities in the U.S. It was not only focused on Muslim believers, but any religious markers resembling Islam became problematic, and they suffered too many security processes. Along with this, the Orientalist narratives helped through a generative discourse that colored the arts, literature, law, and politics in framing Islam as violent, static, and savage. 

The problem of Islamophobia is not only affecting Muslims, but like any other kind of racism, it raises questions against the sustainable future of any society and the world generally. A survey indicates that one in four individuals in Britain and the United States harbor negative perceptions of Muslims. This kind of Marginalization and alienation of Muslims may lead to creating unsatisfied youth who tend to join extremist anti-national groups against the well-being of society. Moreover, the phobia promoted by the vested interest of some people, which Nathan Lean calls the ‘Islamophobia industry’, influences people, and the consequence of such a program engenders anti-Muslim hate within vulnerable groups of people who once tuned in to such propaganda, and join a more problematic stage.  So there is unfair treatment of individuals as knowers, which results in their exclusion or misrepresentation in knowledge production and societal discourses.

2. Epistemic Injustice: Testimonial and Hermeneutical

While the primary goals of our epistemic practices are to convey knowledge to others and to make sense of our own social experiences, this raises ethical concerns. First, I explain epistemic injustice and how it raises awareness of the virtues of epistemic practice, before discussing injustices in Islamophobia specifically. Epistemic injustice refers to a knower's wrongdoing in understanding others. Miranda Fricker distinguishes these injustices as two: Testimonial and hermeneutical. The first one occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to give a deflated level of credibility to a speaker’s words, like the security officer is reluctant to believe your words because of your identity. The second one occurs at a prior stage, when a gap in collective interpretive resources leads someone to an unfair disadvantage when making sense of their social experiences, like the difficulty in explaining the experience of women before the term sexual harassment was used. The epistemic problems are not limited to these two types; there are also many other behaviours, such as closedness, arrogance, and intellectual laziness, that affect human cognition as epistemic beings. Sometimes people may not try to understand others consciously to maintain an uninterrupted life. Examples of these epistemic vices can be seen in media representations and in political narratives. These flaws in creating knowledge distort the self-understanding of especially marginalized people and cause psychological distress in shaping their identity. By addressing these social and political issues from ethical and epistemological perspectives, we can find solutions to epistemic justice and virtues in the practice of understanding.

2.1 Epistemic injustices in Islamophobia and the need for reflexivity

As a kind of racism and intolerance against a specific identity and its representations Islamophobia holds severe epistemic injustices.  Tasneem Alsayyed writes about some kinds of epistemic vices in the work of Martha Nussbaum’s The New Religious Intolerance, which is written against Islamophobia. Tasneem explains that the work includes epistemic vices like exclusion, orientalism, colonial discourse, boomerang perception, and arrogant perception by excluding the experiences of Muslim peoples while studying them. The same mistake also happened to feminist narratives, while mistaking the experiences of white women as the same as those of Muslim women and excluding them from conferences and discussions for finding solutions. Sofie Aaltonen discusses the lack of Reflexivity in the Danish academy while addressing Islamophobia. Reflexivity means acknowledging how one’s positionality shapes knowledge production. She concludes that Danish academics have testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustices in addressing Muslim issues because of existing standards and avoiding Muslim experiences from research. She argues for a decolonial reflexivity that can address issues clearly and provide opportunities to re-examine the information with epistemic humility.

When considering the testimonial injustice in Islamophobia, Arabs or Muslims are encountering what Fricker calls negative identity prejudice and facing marginalisation and suspicion because of their identity. While Muslim men have emerged as the people of popular and media imagination, being portrayed as the embodiment of extremism and terrorism, Muslim women have emerged as a sign of gender subjugation in Islam, being perceived as resisting integration by wearing the headscarf or face veil. In the case of hermeneutic injustice, before the term Islamophobia became popular in the 1990s, there was a limitation in expressing the negative experiences they were facing. Even now, some academies, like Danish, as I mentioned, and other media are not ready to accept it as racial oppression. All these injustices and vices may not be deliberate always, especially when the efforts of Nussbaum were intended to resist Islamophobia. If some ignorance comes from arrogance, some is rooted in luxury, which gives the privilege of not knowing or not needing to know.   But any narrative without a proper understanding of, or ignorance about, the other may eventually act against them. Due to this prevalence of injustices and vices in society, discussions about Islam are staying relevant in the media, and Muslim youth are forced to make counter-narratives against terrorism forcefully to be involved in the mainstream of society. 

3. Epistemic resistance, Subversive lucidity, and Islamophobia

Epistemic resistance refers to central epistemic and political mechanisms and activities that enable democratic interaction to address societal injustices. The core value of this epistemic resistance should be friction and conscious efforts to know others, which will move society from the stage of active ignorance, a condition of epistemic vices, to a stage of subversive lucidity characterised by epistemic virtues. Through this lucidity, carried with epistemic humility, intellectual curiosity, and open-mindedness, society can respond with insensitivity and foster powerful epistemic interactions. Jose Medina explains Expressibility and Responsiveness, at the core of this epistemic interaction. Expressibility means the availability of spaces where group formation and movement are possible, allowing them to articulate their own experiences, interests, and concerns. Responsiveness refers to people’s interest in listening to and responding to others' experiences. By identifying the blind spots through these interactions and sensibilities, only a society can successfully reach into epistemic resistance, the mechanisms and activities of contestation.

Along with political interference and legal procedures, Islamophobia should also be treated with a strong epistemic resistance because of its epistemic roots. This is possible by cultivating positive epistemic habits and attitudes toward understanding Muslims. But all this epistemic resistance cannot succeed without coordinated actions or collective activity. So there is something that Muslims and Muslim organisations can do, but when powerful friction occurs only to create a better understanding between individuals, the resistance can win in eradicating racism. It does not mean to avoid political resistance like public policy engagements and social activism against Islamophobia. But epistemic frictions in understanding Muslim lives and counternarratives to popular misconceptions and prejudices are also important. Rather, in a sense, this epistemic resistance is more powerful at the ground level than other strategies. For example, if two neighbours are in a good relationship and understanding, the chances of clashes because of an outsider will be very low. Likewise, even cottage industries are funding the growth of islamophobia, strong interactions with epistemic humility can overcome such distorted truths. So, the focus of resisting anti-Muslim racism should give importance to the epistemic engagements. 

3.1 Resistance strategies for kaleidoscopic consciousness and chained actions

Resisting any kind of marginalisation requires a pluralistic view of social imagination, or, as Medina calls it, a kaleidoscopic consciousness. In Islamophobia, also, a resistant imagination can contribute to solving the problems of prejudices and hatred. When choosing a method of social pluralism, whether melioristic pluralism or Foucault’s guerrilla pluralism, the choice is largely based on the nature and history of the society. If the marginalize people are in radical exclusion, guerrilla pluralism, which suggests a deconstructive method, will be useful for creating a new social imagination. But in some cases, a melioristic approach of reconstruction will be enough for social friction in less problematic societies. This construction of kaleidoscopic consciousness requires the coordinated actions of individuals and groups linked through social networks to make these acts of resistance echoable, thereby bringing about social change. In the case of Islamophobia, Muslim communities and other social agents have the same responsibility towards creating a pluralistic imagination. The goal of this collective imagination is to create an acknowledgement rather than agreement or disagreement, which brings people together with a radically pluralistic sensibility. In this sense, storytelling from a Muslim perspective, counter-narratives through media and making spaces for social engagement can successfully contribute to the resistance of Islamophobia. Social media and new methods of sharing experiences, such as vlogging, can also be successfully utilised to foster resistant imaginations and interactions with different cultures in new contexts. However, users need motivation to use media to raise awareness of social issues and foster a mindset of wanting to know others. Diversification of knowledge, which is very easy in this information-rich world, is also important for distinguishing reality from fake news and prejudices. These kinds of possibilities for epistemic resistance should be included while addressing the anti-Muslim racism. By considering this idea, we can examine a practical example of epistemic resistance to Islamophobia in South India in the next section.

4. Islamophobia and social life in South India

The example of the South Indian state Kerala is relevant here not only because of its low rate of Islamophobic cases but because of its strong reliance on epistemic friction. Even though very few in numbers, there are cases of Islamophobia in Kerala. When public issues like narcotism and smuggling are related to Muslims, and culprits have Muslim names, it becomes heated discussions in the media and public realms. Johny observes the roots of this Islamophobia from an economic perspective, as it emerged from middle-class Hindu inferiority and jealousy when Muslims developed in education and infrastructure with the Gulf remittance. Even though it may be a reason, a generalisation in this case will overlook other complex causes related to the history and social relations of specific localities. There are also reports from the Christian majority constituency within which lies the Muslim-dominated town of Erattupetta, about how Hindutva is capitalising on both the latent and obvious Islamophobia among Syrian Christians for electoral and other gains. A common characteristic of such cases is that they arise from the southern parts of Kerala, where religious harmony and interreligious cultural interactions are less prevalent than in the Northern region. This indicates how epistemic friction is working against hatred and hostility toward others. In Malabar, where different religions coexist in harmony, the people do not understand Islam from religious texts or media narratives, but through their everyday life and casual interactions with neighbours. Moreover, there are conscious efforts to foster peaceful interactions through different channels.

4.1 Muslim organisations and pluralistic communities of resistance

This strong form of epistemic friction does not result only from the normal culture of Kerala; contributions from different organisations and social activities are decisive to this social harmony, unlike in other parts of India, which are more fertile ground for islamophobia. Along with the long history of Kerala for its hospitality and positive cultural interactions, Muslim organisations worked hard for the societal upliftment of Muslims, which has not happened in North India and led to the separation of rich and poor muslims and a lack of public channels to integrate them. But in Kerala, strong charity initiatives and educational institutions that provide free education to disadvantaged students have led to an improvement in social status. The ulama class developed by these efforts within the traditional Muslims, claiming to be ‘turbaned professionals’ representing Islam in different fields, carrying the role of epistemic friction.  Traditional Muslim organisations, such as those that conduct youth empowerment and nation-building programs, as well as religious programs. While the Indian political situation is becoming worse with anti-Muslim atrocities, Kerala is marking its exceptionalism because of its strong epistemic resistance by creating friction and social sensibility. I suggest that this could be a successful model for resisting Islamophobia and any kind of racism in epistemic ways.

5. Conclusion

As Islamophobia is a cultural racism or a more complex issue of segregation containing epistemic injustice and lack of reflexivity, this article reinforces the need for epistemic ways of resisting it. To bring about this epistemic resistance, a society should be characterised by interactions that exhibit subversive lucidity, a composite of epistemic virtues such as humility, intellectual curiosity, and open-mindedness. In the context of South India, along with political and economic reasons, epistemic friction has an important role in limiting the growth of Islamophobia compared to other parts of India. So, the ways of resistant imagination through cultural interactions should be characterised by epistemic virtues, along with chain actions involving different parts of society. While resisting Islamophobia, powerful strategies should be developed for creating epistemic frictions like storytelling, making spaces online and offline for cultural interactions and diversifying the knowledge resources. These kinds of resistance strategies are essential for dismantling the structures that sustain Islamophobia or any other epistemic injustices and creating a society grounded in justice and mutual understanding.

References

Aaltonen, Sofie. ‘Islamophobia and Danish Academic Knowledge Production’. Lund University, n.d.

Alsayyed, Tasneem. ‘Old Epistemic Vices and Islamophobia in Martha Nussbaum’s The New Religious Intolerance’. Hypatia 39, no. 2 (2024): 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.104.

Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

‘Genealogies of Islamophobia’ | Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlnzGMqpQdc.

Imran Awan and Dr Irene Zempi. ‘A WORKING DEFINITION OF ISLAMOPHOBIA’, November 2020. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Religion/Islamophobia-AntiMuslim/Civil%20Society%20or%20Individuals/ProfAwan-2.pdf.

Imran Awan and Irene Zempi. ‘Impacts of Anti-Muslim Hate Crime’. In Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us All. Runnymede in, 2017.

‘Islamophobia-a-Challenge-for-Us-All-without-Cartoons-1’, n.d.

Kunnummal, Ashraf. ‘Between Appeal to Citizenship and Biopolitical Fracture: Islamophobia and the New Politics of Muslim Citizenship in India’. Islamophobia Studies Journal 8, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.8.2.0261.

Lean, Nathan. The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Hatred of Muslims. Edited by John L. Esposito and Jack G. Shaheen. Second edition. London: Pluto Press, 2017.

Medina, José. The Epistemology of Resistance. Oxford University Press, 2012.

‘Nathan Lean - The Islamophobia Industry_ How the Right Manufactures Hatred of Muslims-Pluto Press (2017)’, n.d.

Nations, United. ‘International Day to Combat Islamophobia’. United Nations. United Nations. Accessed 6 December 2024. https://www.un.org/en/observances/anti-islamophobia-day.

Raju, Haritha John, Maria Teresa. ‘Rise of Kerala Christian Right Is Deeply Rooted in Islamophobia: A Look at Poonjar, Pala’. The News Minute, 12 April 2024. https://www.thenewsminute.com/long-form/rise-of-kerala-christian-right-is-deeply-rooted-in-islamophobia-a-look-at-poonjar-pala.

Sahar Aziz, Khaled A. Beydoun, and Dalia Mogahed. ‘Islamophobia’. In MOVING TOWARD ANTIBIGOTRY. Center for Antiracist Research, 2022. bu.edu/antiracism-center.

syskerala.org. ‘Manava Sancharam Archives’. Accessed 9 December 2024. https://syskerala.org/?cat=29.

Visakh, M. S., R. Santhosh, and C. K. Mohammed Roshan. ‘Islamic Traditionalism in a Globalizing World: Sunni Muslim Identity in Kerala, South India’. Modern Asian Studies 55, no. 6 (November 2021): 2046–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X20000347.

എൽജോണി എം. ‘കേരളത്തിലെ ഇസ്ലാമോഫോബിയയുടെ സാമ്പത്തിക കാരണങ്ങൾ’. The Fourth, 3 August 2024. https://www.thefourthnews.in/opinion/economic-reasons-behind-rising-islamophobia-in-kerala.

About the author:

Sayed Iyas is a postgraduate researcher in social and political philosophy at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Qatar. He holds a Master’s degree in Philosophy from the University of Calicut and is qualified for the UGC-NET in Philosophy. His research engages Islamic intellectual traditions, particularly Qur’anic hermeneutics (tafsīr), Islamic ethics, and concepts such as ʿilm nāfiʿ, as well as contemporary debates in critical theory and political philosophy. His work explores the intersections between Islamic thought and modern social theory.